Throughout
the play, the character Caius Martius is exhibited to be emphasizing as an
anti-hero, possessing qualities of dislike amongst the plebeians. Coriolanus’
first appearance in the play is presented toward the audience with a negative
connotation in the play, providing conflict between two social groups of the
Plebeians and the Patricians. The
intended audience is for and Elizabethan audience, in which we have discussed
in class that this is in fact a political play where the Elizabethan audience
would be very familiar with the political motives and situations of Kings James
I.
The play
starts of with he Plebeians as savages and un educated with how they hold up
their pitch forks and weaponry, however we can see this juxtaposition of
Coriolanus who walks in being far worse as a Patrician. The political play
begins as how the grain isn’t easily distributed amongst the Plebicians, and
blame Coriolanus’ social group. We can begin to see that Shakespeare has
presented Coriolanus as being a villainous character as the Plebeians resent
him and his attitude is seen as very rude and unliked. Perhaps Shakespeare has
exhibited Shakespeare in this way due to the contrasting shocking first
impression against the end character of Coriolanus, developing this character
who embodies a political issue and is seen to change throughout the nature of
the play.
Another
things Shakespeare has revealed about Caius Martius’ character in the opening
of the play is how these two social groups are both effected by this character,
showing the development and how the political issue cannot move on without this
development through the play as seen in the unsatisfying Roman citizens toward
Coriolanus. Perhaps the social party plays part of a systematic society of how
the characters are being portrayed in their development as Coriolanus is
exhibited as rigorous in the opening in the play in contrast to the last scene.
Martius is
also exhibited to clearly establish to the audience that his role in the play
is very much separated from the social ranking of the Plebeians as they are in
the lower class. This results in how
each character develops off one another, exhibiting that the Plebeians portray
him as an anti-hero as in act one he is shown fighting charismatically in war.
Coriolanus is a vital part to the opening of this play as Shakespeare clearly
emphasizes on the foreshadowing of how the situations of political tension will
further heighten to the later major conflicts of this play. His arrogance is
something that could perhaps classify him as a classical hero, as many of them
were arrogant, presenting to the audience of his three dimensional character.
Lastly, in
the outcome of the play, Coriolanus is exhibited as a tragic hero after the
development. The character as mentioned above is very important as highly
developed throughout this play as they create contrast from the opening scene
to the last scene as Shakespeare has used this to develop the key conflicts in
this play. Its interesting that Shakespeare has used such a figure represented
as a anti hero in the beginning to develop key conflicts within the play.
No comments:
Post a Comment